Looking for PowerObjects? Don’t worry, you’re in the right place! We’ve been part of HCL for several years, and we’ve now taken the final step in our acquisition journey: moving our website to the HCL domain. Nothing else is changing – we are still fanatically focused on Microsoft Business Applications!

PowerObjects Blog 

for Microsoft Business Applications


Agile or Waterfall?

Post Author: Joe D365 |

As Microsoft Dynamics 365 projects evolve, the overarching question that project managers need to ask themselves is "which framework best fits my project?" In this blog, we discuss some pros and cons of the "Agile" and "Waterfall" frameworks that might assist you in deciding which is the best fit for your project.

Waterfall

This framework is named "Waterfall" because each life cycle is a sequence that flows downward in a series of phases. Typical phases are Feasibility > Plan > Design > Build > Test > PROD > Support.

Pros:

  • Waterfall is a structured process defined in phases with deliberate deliverables in each phase.
  • There is an emphasis on documentation such as requirements and design documents.
  • Requirements are defined in advance with little flexibility in allowing change once requirements have been signed off.

Cons:

  • Changes in design must go through a formal change control process that can impede timelines and budget.
  • Oftentimes stakeholders aren't completely sure of the design they are asking for. Waterfall is rigid in its design and its ability to change with the clients evolving requirements.
  • The inability to change things done in previous stages.

Agile

The agile framework is based on an incremental and iterative approach. Instead of all the planning being up front, the framework allows for changing requirements over time.

Pros:

  • Change is part of the process and not seen as a weakness to designing the product.
  • Since delivery is iterative, issues and problems tend to come to light much quicker.
  • User feedback is crucial throughout the entire lifecycle of the project.

Cons:

  • Documentation can sometimes be neglected. The Agile Manifesto refers to the value behind working software then comprehensive documentation.
  • Planning tends to be less "fixed" since the requirements are continually growing as the product evolves.
  • There is a risk that the final product may look quite different from the original design.

The goal of each framework is to deliver a functional and quality product. At the end of the day, everyone who is contributing to the Dynamics 365 project must collectively decide on the best approach.

Be sure to keep checking our blog for more Dynamics 365 tips!

Happy Dynamics 365'ing!

Joe CRM
By Joe D365
Joe D365 is a Microsoft Dynamics 365 superhero who runs on pure Dynamics adrenaline. As the face of PowerObjects, Joe D365’s mission is to reveal innovative ways to use Dynamics 365 and bring the application to more businesses and organizations around the world.

PowerObjects Recommends